It’s hardly a secret, even among the SWPL hypocrati, that IQ is important to individual life outcomes, (and, on a grander scale, to a nation’s civilizational supremacy), that it correlates to a host of happy behavioral traits, and that dysgenic mating trends threaten to “decivilize” the West if nothing is done to reverse them. Given these accepted premises, many well-meaning but marginally spergalicious bloggers argue for the glories of assortative mating, (though in point of fact many assortatively sorted couples are meeting based less on shared IQ or unspoken eugenic hopes than on simple segregated convenience). This post may then come as a surprise, advocating as it does for a marital boycott of overeducated women.
IQ (and a woman’s educational level, insofar as the latter is an IQ proxy) is undoubtedly relevant if you’re interested in improving your future kids’ economic prospects, and likely getting more so…
View original post 2,023 more words
How much you wanna bet this note is made up bullshit?
She’s an airline pilot, a captain, but mere words got under her skin.
She posted that, and replied:
“I respectfully disagree with your opinion that the ‘cockpit,’ (we now call it the flight desk as no cocks are required), is no place for a lady. In fact, there are no places that are not for ladies anymore.”
Classy, eh? The term ‘cockpit‘ has nothing to do with penises.
Oh, and there still are places not for ladies, or even women for that matter: the pulpit in a decent church; wherever special forces are deployed; and still many other places, not least of which being the men’s room.